I’m a neuroscience and trauma-informed coach and the founder of Regulated Living. What you’ll find here are the tools, resources, and support I wish I had earlier in my own healing journey.
Hi! I'm Amanda
If you’ve ever sought help for anxiety or depression, there’s a good chance you’ve heard something like this: “Your symptoms are caused by a chemical imbalance in your brain. These medications will help correct that imbalance.”
This explanation is simple, straightforward, and has been repeated by healthcare providers for decades. It’s also a narrative that has shaped how millions understand their mental health conditions and the treatments they receive.
But what if I told you that this widely accepted explanation isn’t actually supported by scientific evidence?
Let’s explore the origins of the chemical imbalance theory, examine why it persists despite contradictory evidence, and discuss what this means for your understanding of anxiety, depression, and your healing journey.
The “chemical imbalance theory” of depression and anxiety took hold in the 1960s and 1970s, coinciding with the development of a new class of antidepressant medications called selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
Here’s how the theory gained momentum:
The development of the chemical imbalance theory followed a peculiar backward logic:
This is similar to discovering that aspirin helps headaches and then concluding that all headaches must be caused by an “aspirin deficiency.” Or that caffeine improves energy, so fatigue must be caused by a “caffeine deficiency.” It’s a correlation that was transformed into a causal explanation without sufficient evidence.
The theory gained significant traction when pharmaceutical companies recognized its marketing potential. A simple, biological explanation for depression made medication seem like the logical solution and helped destigmatize mental health conditions by framing them as medical issues no different from diabetes or hypertension.
The narrative was compelling: “Depression isn’t your fault; it’s just a chemical imbalance in your brain that our medication can fix.”
By the 1990s and 2000s, this explanation had been repeated so often—in direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertisements, doctor’s offices, by friends and family, and popular media—that it became accepted as fact in the public consciousness.
While the chemical imbalance theory has dominated our understanding of depression and anxiety for decades, the scientific evidence tells a different story:
A comprehensive 2022 umbrella review published in Molecular Psychiatry examined all available evidence regarding the serotonin theory of depression. The researchers concluded that there is no convincing evidence that depression is associated with, or caused by, lower serotonin concentrations or activity.
Other key findings from recent research include:
The science points to a much more complex picture than a simple deficiency of one or more neurotransmitters.
Current evidence suggests that mental health conditions like anxiety and depression involve complex interactions between:
Rather than a single chemical imbalance, mental health conditions appear to be whole-system responses—your brain and body’s attempt to adapt to various forms of stress, threat, or adversity.
If the chemical imbalance theory isn’t supported by evidence, why is it still so widely promoted? There are several compelling reasons:
Research shows that it typically takes 17 years for new scientific findings to be incorporated into clinical practice. Many healthcare providers are simply practicing what they were taught, and continuing education often doesn’t prioritize updating these fundamental concepts.
The chemical imbalance theory provides a simple, concrete explanation for what can otherwise feel like mysterious and overwhelming emotional experiences. Both providers and patients may prefer this clear explanation over more complex, multifaceted understandings.
In a world where physicians may have only 15 minutes per patient, there’s limited time to explain complex physiological interactions. “Chemical imbalance” provides a quick shorthand that can be communicated in seconds.
The pharmaceutical industry has a vested interest in maintaining explanations that position their products as addressing the root cause of mental health conditions, rather than as one of many possible interventions.
The “biological disease” model helped reduce stigma by suggesting that depression isn’t a character flaw or personal weakness. Many providers continue using this framing to help patients feel less shame about their conditions.
Let me share a story about a 17-year-old client that illustrates why this theory matters. When we started working together, he had spent years on various psychiatric medications. His psychiatrist had just doubled his SNRI dose, even though he’d repeatedly reported the medications weren’t making much difference.
When I asked if he understood why he was taking these medications, he explained that his doctor told him he was “just born with a chemical imbalance” and that medication would be the best way to manage his symptoms.
The reality of this teen’s life painted a different picture:
These weren’t symptoms of a mysterious chemical imbalance—they made perfect sense given his circumstances. He was starting each day sleep-deprived and nutritionally depleted, with a full stress bucket and limited coping strategies.
At the end of our conversation about how his symptoms connected to his actual life experiences, he said, “This was definitely way more helpful than the same six questions my psychiatrist asks every month before writing me a new prescription.”
At Regulated Living we take a whole-human, whole-life approach to healing.
Understanding that the chemical imbalance theory lacks scientific support doesn’t mean that medication isn’t helpful for many people. SSRIs and other psychiatric medications can provide significant relief for some individuals, even if they don’t work by “correcting an imbalance.”
What it does mean is that we need a more comprehensive approach to understanding and healing anxiety and depression:
Instead of asking “What chemicals are imbalanced in my brain?” consider these questions:
Understanding the limitations of the chemical imbalance theory also highlights the importance of informed consent in mental health treatment. You deserve to know:
Being informed allows you to make choices aligned with your values and needs, rather than being limited to what a single theory suggests.
If the chemical imbalance theory doesn’t adequately explain anxiety and depression, what framework might be more helpful? At Regulated Living, we approach mental health through what we call a “physiology first—but not physiology only” perspective:
Rather than viewing anxiety and depression as chemical malfunctions, we can understand them as intelligent nervous system responses to perceived threat or overwhelm.
Your nervous system is constantly scanning your environment, your body, and your relationships for signs of safety or danger. When it detects more danger cues than safety cues (whether those dangers are psychological, physical, or social), it shifts into protective states:
These states made perfect evolutionary sense—they protected our ancestors from predators and social exclusion. But in our modern world, they can become chronic and unhelpful responses.
Another helpful framework is the “stress bucket” model:
This model explains why the same person might be resilient in some circumstances but struggle in others, and why different people have different thresholds for similar stressors.
If the chemical imbalance theory isn’t accurate, then taking a pill to “correct” it can’t be the complete solution. Instead, healing anxiety and depression requires a more strategic, personalized approach:
Start by taking inventory of what might be contributing to your symptoms:
Basic medical tests often miss important factors that influence mental health. Consider requesting:
Begin by addressing basic biological needs and imbalances:
This “physiology first” approach creates capacity for deeper healing by stabilizing your nervous system. But don’t stop there—a “physiology only” approach is equally incomplete.
Learn both reactive and proactive nervous system regulation strategies:
With a more regulated nervous system, you’ll have greater capacity to explore and heal:
Perhaps the most important takeaway from debunking the chemical imbalance theory is this: your symptoms make sense.
Your anxiety or depression isn’t a random chemical malfunction or a genetic defect. It’s an intelligent response by your brain and body to your unique combination of life experiences, current circumstances, physiological state, and learned patterns.
This perspective is both empowering and validating. It means you’re not broken—you’re responding in understandable ways to a complex set of factors. And it means that healing is possible through addressing these underlying factors, not just by attempting to correct a chemical imbalance that may not exist.
Whether medication is part of your healing journey or not, understanding the full context of your symptoms opens the door to more comprehensive, personalized, and effective approaches to creating lasting wellbeing.
This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or qualified mental health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Terms and Conditions
© COPYRIGHT 2025. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
A mental health newsletter that feels like a deep breath: simple, grounding, and here to remind you that healing is possible.
FAQs
About
Home
Regulated Living provides neuroscience-backed mental health coaching to help you regulate your nervous system and reclaim your life from anxiety and depression.
Contact
Release Class
Membership
1:1 Coaching
Retreats
Podcast
Blog
Freebies
Book
Paragraph